JPR: Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance  Review
Signup for JPR Updates
News and Meetings
06.18.10: Meeting Agenda - June 23, 2010
[ READ MORE ]
06.18.10: Meeting Notice - June 23, 2010
[ READ MORE ]
06.18.10: Meeting Agenda - June 23, 2010
[ READ MORE ]
06.18.10: Commission to Vote on Performance of Justices and Judges on 2010 General Election Ballot
[ READ MORE ]
bottom of table
Who Judges the Judges? You Do! We Can Help. Meeting Agenda Header
January 07, 2005
 
Meeting Agenda - January 7, 2005
Related News
Meeting Minutes - January 7, 2005  
Meeting Notice - January 7, 2005
bottom of table

MEETING DATE: January 7, 2005
MEETING LOCATION: The Property
1251 Gila Bend Highway
Casa Grande, Arizona

  • 8:00 a.m. New Member Orientation
    • Continental Breakfast Available
  • 9:00 a.m. Call to Order
  • 9:05 a.m. Vice Chief Justice Ruth McGregor
  • 9:45 a.m. Introduction of New Members
  • 10:00 a.m. Approval of September 10, 2004 Minutes
  • 10:10 a.m. JPR Commission Overview
    • 2004 Retention Election Summary - Eric Carlson
    • 2004 Statistics - Judy Pfau
    • 2005 Legislative Session - Margaret Kenski, Chair
  • 10:30 a.m. Discussion Items re Potential 2005 Workgroups...........Margaret Kenski, Chair

A. Voter Information Pamphlet

  • The Colorado Model
  • Inclusion of Narrative about Each Judge - Career, Education, Activities
  • Presiding Judge Data Scores
  • Ranking Judges by Summary Score
  • Possible Inclusion of Judicial Conduct Information (depends on rule change)
  • Simplification of Terminology, Rewrite of Commission Statement

B. The Survey Process

  • Should Clerks Be Added to Staff Questionnaire Distribution?
  • Who Should Evaluate the Presiding Judges?
  • Should Staff Attorneys Be Separated from Other Attorneys?
  • Peer Evaluation for Appellate Judges?
  • Accuracy and Reliability of Data Reports
  • Enhancing the Return Rate - Should Questionnaires Be Coded?

C. JPR Commission Voting Process

  • What constitutes a "Majority" as stated in the Rules?
  • Should we Adopt a 3-Tier System? Meets, Meets with Reservations, Does Not Meet?
  • Should JPR Have Access to Redacted Open-End Comments on Surveys?
  • Should Judges Be Able to Vote for Themselves?
  • Should JPR Have Summary Information from CJC If Rule Is Changed?
  • Should Low Scoring Judges Make Personal Appearances or Be Limited to Letters?
  • Should We Have Another Meeting Before the Public Vote to Review Letter Responsesor for Personal Appearances?
  • Should Statements from Public Hearings Include the Commentor's Relationship to the Judge?
  • Should Public Input Be Allowed at the July Meeting?

D. Voter Education

  • Ongoing Educational Series
  • Speakers' Bureau
  • Website Review
  • Role of Judges Up for Retention in PR Efforts

E. Conference Teams

  • Is the Self-Evaluation Form Too Cumbersome?
  • Should We Eliminate Training Requirement for Returning CT Members?

F. Workgroup Assignments

  • Voter Information Pamphlet
  • Surveys
  • Voting Process
  • Voter Education
  • Conference Team
11:45 a.m. Next Meeting Date
March 4, 2005 - 9:00 a.m.
The Property
Casa Grande
11:50 a.m. Call to the Public ............ Margaret Kenski
11:55 a.m. Adjournment................... Margaret Kenski
JPR WEBSITE: http://www.supreme.state.az.us/jpr, azjudges.info, azjudgereviews.info

 
Home Privacy Policy 2005 Judicial Performance Review